<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Signal 46 &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.signal46.com/tag/california/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.signal46.com</link>
	<description>Unit in distress...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CA Ban on Same-Sex Marriage Ruled Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://blog.signal46.com/2008/05/15/ca-ban-on-same-sex-marriage-ruled-unconstitutional</link>
		<comments>http://blog.signal46.com/2008/05/15/ca-ban-on-same-sex-marriage-ruled-unconstitutional#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.signal46.com/?p=1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be interesting to see how all the other states will react. This establishes precedent and I expect that there will be other suits against other states that allowed blatant discrimination to be voted into law.   CNN&#8217;s story: here. I imagine if the SCOTUS affirms the decision that will only help the cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be interesting to see how all the other states will react. This establishes precedent and I expect that there will be other suits against other states that allowed blatant discrimination to be voted into law.   CNN&#8217;s story: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/05/15/same.sex.marriage/index.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>I imagine if the SCOTUS affirms the decision that will only help the cause.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.signal46.com/2008/05/15/ca-ban-on-same-sex-marriage-ruled-unconstitutional/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
